RUTGERS UNIVERSITY STUDENT INSTRUCTIONAL RATING FORM Spring 02                         
01 640 135 04   60530       HARTKE              S                                                        
         ENROLL=  033       RESP=  19         STRONGLY              STRONGLY   # OF     MEAN    MEAN  MEAN    MEAN       
                                              DISAGREE    NEUTRAL    AGREE      NO       OF      OF    OF      OF      
PART A: UNIVERSITY-WIDE QUESTIONS:                 1    2    3    4    5    RESPONSES   SECTION COURSE DEPT 100 LEVEL   
 1. The instructor was prepared for class and
    presented the material in an organized manner  0    0    0    7    12       0       4.63    4.32  4.25    4.16   

 2. The instructor responded effectively to
    student comments and questions                 0    0    2    6    11       0       4.47    4.18  4.11    4.03   

 3. The instructor generated interest in the
    course material                                0    1    6    5    7        0       3.95    3.93  3.87    3.76   

 4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward
    assisting all students in understanding
    course material                                0    0    2    4    13       0       4.58    4.22  4.21    4.12   
                                                                                                                                                                                                               
 5. The instructor assigned grades fairly          0    1    1    7    10       0       4.37    4.07  4.10    4.02   

 6. The instructional methods encouraged
    student learning                               0    0    4    10   5        0       4.05    3.84  3.78    3.67   

 7. I learned a great deal in this course          0    0    5    8    6        0       4.05    3.86  3.81    3.70   

 8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject
    matter and wanted to take this course          1    2    9    4    3        0       3.32    3.05  3.14    3.04   
 
                                                 POOR               EXCELLENT
 9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of
    the instructor as                              0    0    2    6    11       0       4.47    4.08  4.00    3.89   

10. I rate the overall quality of the course as    0    0    6    8    5        0       3.95    3.75  3.76    3.65   
                    
PART B: QUESTIONS ADDED BY DEPARTMENT OR INSTRUCTOR:
11.                                                0    2    2    8    3        4       3.80    3.66  3.76    3.76   
12.                                                1    1    4    8    1        4       3.47    3.53  3.73    3.61   
13.                                                0    1    3    7    4        4       3.93    4.00  4.05    3.97   
14.                                                1    1    8    4    0        5       3.07    3.19  3.72    3.52   
15.                                                0    0    0    0    0        19      0.00    4.00  3.86    3.67   
16.                                                0    0    0    0    0        19      0.00    3.00  3.95    3.80   
17.                                                0    0    0    0    0        19      0.00    3.00  3.86    3.60   
18.                                                0    0    0    0    0        19      0.00    3.00  4.00    3.71   
19.                                                0    0    0    0    0        19      0.00    1.00  2.55    2.00