next up previous
Next: Weak Topologies and Continuous Up: Locally Convex Spaces and Previous: Dual Spaces for LCS

Duality and Weak Topologies

Definition 1.3.1   Let $ X$ and $ Y$ be vector spaces. We say $ X$ and $ Y$ are an algebraic dual pair (or, an algebraic duality) if there is a bilinear functional

$\displaystyle \left\langle{ \cdot, \cdot }\right\rangle : X \times Y \rightarrow \mathbb{F}$

so that
  1. The collection of functionals

    $\displaystyle \left\langle{ \cdot, y }\right\rangle : x \mapsto \left\langle{ x,y }\right\rangle , y \in Y $

    separates points in $ X$.
  2. The collection of functionals

    $\displaystyle \left\langle{ x, \cdot }\right\rangle : y \mapsto \left\langle{ x,y }\right\rangle , x \in X $

    separates points in $ Y$.

Example:
$ X$ and $ X^*$ are dual pair via $ (x,f) \mapsto f(x)$.
If $ X, Y$ are LCS and all the functionals are continuous , we drop the adjective ``algebraic"

Wednesday, January 17, 2006:

More on duality and the weak topologies.

Recall: For a vector space $ X$ and a collection of linear functionals $ F$, on $ X$, the weak topology induced by $ F$ is the LCS topology induced by the seminorms

$\displaystyle \rho_f(x) = \vert f(x)\vert,   f \in F $

This is denoted $ \sigma(X,F)$ or $ \sigma(X,F)$-topology.

Definition 1.3.2   If $ X$ is a LCS, the weak topology on $ X$ is $ \sigma(X,X^*)$ (also denoted $ wk$ in the text) and the weak star topology on $ X^*$ is $ \sigma(X^*,X)$ (where $ X$ is thought of as a subset of $ X^{**}$). The book denotes this topology as $ wk^*$.

``Obvious" Properties

  1. If $ F \subset G$, sets of functionals, then $ \sigma(X,F) \subset \sigma(X,G)$.
  2. $ \sigma(X,F)$ is Hausdorff iff $ F$ separates points; i.e.,

    $\displaystyle \bigcap_{f \in F} \ker f = \{ 0 \} $

  3. If $ f \in F$, then $ f$ is continuous with respect to the $ \sigma(X,F)$ topology.

    Proof.

    $\displaystyle f^{-1}(B_\epsilon (0)) = \vert f\vert^{-1}((-\epsilon ,\epsilon )) = \{ x \in X : p_f(x) < \epsilon \} $

    The set on the right is open by the definition of weak topology. $ \qedsymbol$

  4. Suppose $ V$ is a neighborhood of 0 in the $ \sigma(X,F)$-topology. If $ x$ is infinite-dimensional, then $ V$ contains an infinite-dimensional subspace of $ X$.

    Proof. $ V$ contains a basic open set containing 0. Thus, there is $ f_1, \ldots, f_n \in F$ and $ \epsilon _1, \ldots, \epsilon _n > 0$ such that

    $\displaystyle V \supset \{ x in X : \vert f_i(x)\vert < \epsilon _i, i = 1, \ldots, n \} $

    If $ N = \{ x \in X : f_i(x) = 0, i = 1, \ldots, n \}$ then $ N \leq V$ and $ \dim X \leq n + \dim N$. $ \qedsymbol$

Fact: For $ \phi, \phi_1, \ldots, \phi_n$ linear functionals on a vector space $ X$, the following are equivalent:

  1. $ \displaystyle \phi = \sum_{i=1}^n \alpha_i \phi_i$ for scalars $ \alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n$
  2. There is $ \alpha \geq 0$ such that $ \vert\phi(x)\vert \leq \alpha \max \vert \phi_i(x)\vert$
  3. $ \bigcap \ker \phi_i \subset \ker \phi$.

Proof. We prove two different parts:
$ 1 \implies 2 \implies 3$
Are either clear or repeated computations.
$ 3 \implies 1$
Define $ T:X \rightarrow \mathbb{F}^n$ by

$\displaystyle T(x) = (\phi_1 x, \phi_2 x, \ldots, \phi_n x).$

Observe $ \ker T = \bigcap \ker \phi_i \subset \ker \phi$.
By linear algebra, there is $ f: \mathbb{F}^n \rightarrow \mathbb{F}$, a linear functional such that $ \phi(x) = f \circ T(x)$. But $ f$ is given by a matrix $ [ \alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n]$ such that $ f(\beta_1, \ldots, \beta_n) = \sum_{i=1}^n \alpha_i \beta_i$
Thus,

$\displaystyle \phi(x) = f \circ T(x) = f(\phi_1 x_1, \ldots, \phi_n x) $

$\displaystyle = \sum_{i=1}^n \alpha_i \phi_i(x) $

So, (1) holds.
$ \qedsymbol$

Theorem 1.3.3   Fundamental Theorem of Weak Topologies:
If a linear functional $ \phi$ on $ X$ is continuous in the $ \sigma(X,F)$ topology, then $ \phi$ is in the linear manifold generated by $ F$.

Proof. By the first result for dual spaces, there are seminorms $ p_{f_1}, \ldots, p_{f_n}$, $ f_i \in F$ and $ \alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n \geq 0$ so that

$\displaystyle \vert\phi(x)\vert \leq \sum_{i=1}^n \alpha_i p_{f_i}(x) $

Letting $ \alpha = \sum \alpha_i$, we have

$\displaystyle \vert\phi(x)\vert \leq \alpha \max \vert f_i(x)\vert $

By the fact just proved, $ \phi$ is a linear combination of the $ f_i$. $ \qedsymbol$

Corollary 1.3.4   These corollaries follow from the above theorem:
  1. (Universal property of the weak topology) If $ F$ is a linear space of functionals on $ X$ then, with the $ \sigma(X,F)$ topology, $ X^*$ is $ F$. In fact, $ \sigma(X,F)$ is the smallest topology with this property. (Easy to prove from the definition)
    In particular, for $ X$ an LCS,

    $\displaystyle (X,wk)^* = X^*,$

    $\displaystyle (X^*, wk^*)^* = X.$

Concretely, thinking of $ \ell^1$ as $ (c_0)^*$,

$\displaystyle (\ell^1,wk^*)^* = c_0 $

but $ (c_0)^{**} = \ell^\infty$

Assignment In #6, complete means (i.e., $ (x_n)$ Cauchy), for all $ U$ open, $ 0 \in U$, there exists $ N$ such that for all $ m,n \geq N$,

$\displaystyle x_m - x_n \in U $

Friday, January 20, 2006:

More corollaries of the fundamental theorem:

  1. If $ L$ is the linear manifold generated by $ F$, then the $ \sigma(X,F)$ and $ \sigma(X,L)$ topologies are the same.
  2. If $ X, Y$ are vector spaces that are an algebraic dual pair, i.e., we have $ \left\langle{ \cdot, \cdot }\right\rangle : X \times Y \rightarrow \mathbb{F}$ and we give $ X$ and $ Y$ the weak topologies induced by $ \left\langle{ \cdot, Y }\right\rangle $ and $ \left\langle{ X, \cdot }\right\rangle $, then $ X^* = Y$ and $ Y^* = X$.


next up previous
Next: Weak Topologies and Continuous Up: Locally Convex Spaces and Previous: Dual Spaces for LCS
Brian Bockelman 2006-04-21