next up previous
Next: Invariant Subspaces: Up: Functional Analysis Notes Previous: Linear Operators on Banach

Compact Operators on Banach Spaces

Let $ X, Y$ be Banach spaces and let $ K \in B(X,Y)$. Call $ K$ compact if % latex2html id marker 17153
$ \overline{K(\text{ball }X)}$ is compact in $ Y$.

Definition 6.0.1   Call $ T \in B(X,Y)$ completely continuous if for all sequences $ (x_n) \in X$ with $ x_n \rightarrow x$ weakly, $ T x_n \rightarrow T x$ in norm.

Proposition 6.0.2   For $ T \in B(X,Y)$,
  1. $ T$ compact $ \implies$ $ T$ completely continuous.
  2. If $ X$ is reflexive, $ T$ completely continuous, $ T$ is compact.

Example: If $ T \in B(\ell^1, \ell^1)$, then $ T$ is completely continuous (by HW). So the identity operator on $ \ell^1$ is not compact.

Proof.
  1. Suppose $ x_n \rightarrow 0$ weakly. By PUB, $ M = \sup \Vert x_n\Vert < \infty$. WLOG, $ M \leq 1$ and so

    % latex2html id marker 17204
$\displaystyle (T x_n ) \subset \overline{T(\text{ball }X)} $

    By compactness, % latex2html id marker 17206
$ \exists (x_{n_k}), y \in \overline{T(\text{ball }X)}$ such that $ T x_{n_k} \rightarrow y$ in norm. But $ T x_{n_k} \rightarrow y$ weakly; but $ T x_{n_k} \rightarrow 0$ by the definition, so $ y = 0$. $ T$ is completely continuous.
  2. Assume $ X$ is reflexive and separable; $ ($ball $ X,$   wk $ ^*)$ is a compact metric space (compact by reflexive, metric by separable). Let $ (x_n)$ be a sequence in ball $ X$. There is $ (x_{n_k})$ such that $ x_{n_k} \rightarrow x$ weakly for some $ x \in$   ball $ X$. By complete continuity of $ T$, $ T x_{n_k} \rightarrow T x$ in norm. % latex2html id marker 17239
$ \overline{T(\text{ball }X)}$ is sequentially compact, i.e., compact.

    In general, let $ (x_n)$ be a sequence in $ X$. Let % latex2html id marker 17245
$ Z = \overline{\text{span }}\{x_n, n \in \mathbb{N}\} $. Then, $ Z \leq X$ and $ Z$ is separable and reflexive. If $ U = T\vert _Z$, then $ U$ is also completely continuous, and so, by the special case, $ U$ is compact. But $ T x_n = U x_n$ for all $ n \in \mathbb{N}$. So, $ (T x_n)$ has a convergent subsequence. Hence, $ T$ is compact.

$ \qedsymbol$

Theorem 6.0.3   (Schauder). For $ T \in B(X,Y)$, $ T$ is compact iff $ T^*$ is compact.

Proof. Let $ (f_n)$ be a sequence in ball $ Y^*$. By Alaoglu, $ f_n$ has a wk $ ^*$-convergent subsequence $ f_{n_k}$ with $ f_{n_k} \rightarrow g$ for some $ g \in$   ball $ Y^*$.

Claim: $ T^* f_n \rightarrow T^* g$. Let $ \epsilon > 0$, $ N \geq 1$. Pick $ \frac\epsilon 3$-net for % latex2html id marker 17302
$ \overline{T(\text{ball }X)}$, i.e., $ y_1, \ldots, y_m$ such that % latex2html id marker 17306
$ \overline{T(\text{ball }X)} \subset \bigcup_{j=1}^m B_{y_j} (\frac\epsilon 3)$. As $ f_n \rightarrow g$ wk $ ^*$, there is $ M \geq N$ such that

$\displaystyle \vert(f_n - g)(y_\ell)\vert < \frac\epsilon 3,   i = 1, \ldots, m $

Let $ x \in$   ball $ X$ and pick $ y_k$ such that $ \Vert Tx - y_k \Vert < \frac\epsilon 3$. Then,

$\displaystyle (T^* f_n - T^* g)(x) = (f_n - g)(Tx) $

$\displaystyle \leq \vert(f_n - g)(Tx - y_k)\vert + \vert(f_n - g)(y_k)\vert \leq 2\Vert Tx - y_k\Vert + \frac\epsilon 3 = \epsilon $

Thus, $ \Vert T^* f_n - T^* g\Vert \leq \epsilon $ for $ n \geq M$. So, $ T^*$ is compact.

For the reverse direction, $ T^{**} : X^{**} \rightarrow Y^{**}$ is compact. Notice $ T^{**}\vert _X$ is also compact. But, by an ``obvious" property, $ T^{**}\vert _X = T$. So, $ T$ is compact.
$ \qedsymbol$

Let $ B_0(X,Y)$ denote the compact operators. Let $ B_{00}(X,Y)$ be the finite rank operators. Imitating the proofs for operators on Hilbert spaces,

  1. $ B_0(X,Y) \leq B(X,Y)$.
  2. the product of a compact operator and a bounded operator is compact.
  3. $ B_0(X)$ is a closed two-sided ideal in $ B(X)$.

    Definition 6.0.4   We say that $ (x_n)_{n=1}^\infty$ in $ X$ is a Schauder basis if for every $ x \in X$, there is a unique sequence of scalars $ (\alpha_n)$ such that $ X = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \alpha_n x_n$ (converges in norm).

  4. If $ X$ has a Schauder basis, then $ B_{00}(X)$ is (norm) )dense in $ B_0(X)$.
    Counterexample: Enflo, in 1973, gave a reflexive separable Banach space, $ X$, such that $ B_{00}(X)$ is not dense in $ B_0(X)$. In particular, $ X$ does not have a Schauder basis. On the other hand, all the ``classical" Banach spaces have the finite ranks norm-dense in the compacts.

Sample Result: $ B_{00}(C(X))$ is norm-dense in $ B_0(C(X))$ for $ X$ compact.

Recall:

  1. $ \mathcal{F}\subset C(X)$ is compact iff $ \mathcal{F}$ is closed, bounded, and equicontinuous.
  2. For a finite open cover $ \mathcal{C}$ of a topological space $ X$, a partition of unity subordinate to $ \mathcal{C}$ is a set of continuous $ f_C : X \rightarrow [0,1]$, $ c \in \mathcal{C}$

    $\displaystyle \sum _{c \in \mathcal{C}} f_c \equiv 1 $

    $\displaystyle f_c(x) = 0,   \forall x \notin c $

    If $ X$ is normal, then there is a partition of unity subordinate to each finite open cover.

    Proof. Let $ T \in B_0(C(X)), \epsilon > 0$. Goal: Build $ F \in B_{00}(C(X))$ such that $ \Vert T - F\Vert < \epsilon $. By Arzela-Ascola, as % latex2html id marker 17415
$ \overline{T(\text{ball }C(X))}$ is compact, it is equicontinuous. Thus, for each $ x \in X$, there is an open set $ U_x$ with $ x \in U_x$,

    $\displaystyle \vert(Tf)(y) - (Tf)(x)\vert < \epsilon $

    for all $ y \in U_x$, $ f \in$   ball $ C(X)$. By compactness, there is $ x_1, \ldots, x_n$ such that $ X \subset \bigcup_{i=1}^n U_{x_i}$. There is a partition of unity $ f_1, \ldots, f_n$ subordinate to $ U_{x_1}, \ldots, U_{x_n}$.

    Define $ F:C(X) \rightarrow C(Y)$ by

    $\displaystyle F f = \sum_{i=1}^n [ (Tf)(x_i)] f_i $

    Clearly, $ F \in B_{00}(C(X))$ as % latex2html id marker 17444
$ \textrm{ran }F \subset V\{f_1, \ldots, f_n\}$.

    Claim: $ \Vert T - F\Vert \leq \epsilon $:

    $\displaystyle \vert(Tf)(x) - Ff(x)\vert = \vert\sum_{j=1}^n (Tf)(x) - f_j(x) - \sum_{j=1}^n (Tf)(x_j) f_j(x)\vert $

    $\displaystyle = \vert\sum_{j=1}^n [ Tf(x) - Tf(x_j)] f_j(x) \vert \leq \sum_{j=1}^n \vert Tf(x) - Tf(x)\vert f_j(x) $

    $\displaystyle < \epsilon $

    $\displaystyle f_j(x) \geq 0 \implies x \in U_x \implies \vert(Tf)(x) - (Tf)(x_j)\vert < \epsilon $

    $ \qedsymbol$

Friday, March 31, 2006:



Subsections
next up previous
Next: Invariant Subspaces: Up: Functional Analysis Notes Previous: Linear Operators on Banach
Brian Bockelman 2006-04-21