Example: If
, then
is completely continuous (by HW). So the identity operator on
is not compact.
In general, let
be a sequence in
. Let
. Then,
and
is separable and reflexive. If
, then
is also completely continuous, and so, by the special case,
is compact. But
for all
. So,
has a convergent subsequence. Hence,
is compact.
Claim:
.
Let
,
. Pick
-net for
, i.e.,
such that
. As
wk
, there is
such that
For the reverse direction,
is compact. Notice
is also compact. But, by an ``obvious" property,
.
So,
is compact.
Let
denote the compact operators. Let
be the finite rank operators. Imitating the proofs for operators on Hilbert spaces,
Sample Result:
is norm-dense in
for
compact.
Recall:
Define
by
Claim:
:
Friday, March 31, 2006: