next up previous
Next: Metrizability Up: Locally Convex Spaces and Previous: Separation Properties and Constructing

Alaoglu's Theorem

Monday, February 6, 2006:

Theorem 1.9.1   Alaoglu's Theorem ($ 2^{nd}$ most important)
Let $ X$ be a normed space. Then $ \{ f \in X^*: \Vert f\Vert \leq 1 \}$ is $ wk^*$-compact.

Proof. We use Tychanoff's Theorem.
For $ x \in B_1(0) \subset X$, let

$\displaystyle D_x := \{ \alpha \in \mathbb{F}: \vert\alpha\vert \leq 1 \}, $

a compact set. Let

$\displaystyle D = \prod_{x \in B_1(0)} D_x := \{ g : B_1(0) \rightarrow D_x \} $

$ D$, with the product topology, is compact by Tychanoff. Define $ \tau_x: D \rightarrow D_x$ by $ f \mapsto f(x)$. That is, $ \tau(f)$ is $ f\vert _{B_1(0)}$.

Claim 1: $ \tau$ is injective
If $ f,g \in B_1^*$. and $ \tau(f) = \tau(g)$, then $ f$ and $ g$ agree on $ \overline{B_1(0)}$ and, since $ f$ and $ g$ are linear, $ f = g$.

Claim 2: $ \tau$ is a ($ wk^*$,product topology) homeomorphism onto its range
Suppose $ f_\lambda \rightarrow f$ in the $ wk^*$ topology in $ X^*$. This occurs iff for all $ x \in X$, $ f_\lambda(x) \rightarrow f(x)$ iff $ \forall x \in \overline{B_1(0)}$, $ f_\lambda(x) \rightarrow f(x)$, iff $ \forall x \in \overline{B_1(0)}$ $ \pi_x(\tau(f_\lambda)) \rightarrow \pi_x(\tau(f))$, iff $ \tau(f_\lambda) \rightarrow \tau(f)$ in the product topology.

Claim 3: $ \tau(B_1^*)$ is (product topology) closed
Suppose $ \tau(f_\lambda)$ is a net in $ \tau(B_1^*)$ converging to $ \phi \in D$. For $ x,y \in \overline{B_1(0)}$ with $ x+y \in \overline{B_1(0)}$,

$\displaystyle \phi(x+y) = \lim_\lambda \tau(f_\lambda)(x+y) = \lim_\lambda \tau(f_\lambda)(x) + \lim_\lambda \tau(f_\lambda(y)) = \phi(x) + \phi(y) $

Similarly,

$\displaystyle \phi(\alpha x ) = \alpha \phi(x) $

for $ \alpha \in \mathbb{F}$, $ x \in \overline{B_1(0)}$ such that $ \alpha x \in \overline{B_1(0)}$. Extend $ \phi$ to $ f:X \rightarrow \mathbb{F}$ by

$\displaystyle f(x) = \Vert x\Vert \phi\left( \frac{x}{\Vert x\Vert} \right) $

Claim 4: $ f \in X^*$
That $ f$ is linear is an exercise
To see that $ f$ is bounded, observe that

$\displaystyle f(\overline{B_1(0)}) \subset \{ \alpha \in F : \vert\alpha\vert \leq 1 \} $

Finally, $ \tau(f) = g$

As a closed subset of a compact set, $ \tau(B_1^*)$ is compact and, as $ \tau$ is a homeomorphism, $ B_1^*$ is compact.

$ \qedsymbol$

Corollary 1.9.2   Every Banach space is isometrically isomorphic to a closed subspace of $ C(X)$ for some compact Hausdorff space $ X$.

Proof. Let $ B$ be a Banach space. Let $ X$ be $ \{ f \in B^* : \Vert f\Vert \leq 1 \}$ with the $ wk^*$-topology. Define $ \Delta : B \rightarrow C(X)$ by

$\displaystyle (\Delta(b))(f) = f(b) $

Fact: $ \Delta$ is an isometric isomorphism.
To see isometric, observe, for $ b \in B$, % latex2html id marker 13708
$ \exists f \in B^*$, $ \Vert f\Vert \leq 1$ such that $ f(b) = \Vert b\Vert$ (Corollary of the Hahn Banach theorem).

Since $ f \in X$, so

$\displaystyle \Vert\Delta(b)\Vert _\infty = \sup_{g \in X} \vert\Delta(b)(g)\vert = \sup_g \in X \vert g(b)\vert = \Vert b \Vert $

$ \qedsymbol$

Theorem 1.9.3   Let $ S$ be a $ wk^*$-closed subset of $ X^*$, $ X$ a Banach space. Then $ S$ is $ wk^*$-compact if and only if $ S$ is norm-bounded

Proof.
$ \rightarrow$
If $ S$ is norm-bouned, then there is $ r > 0$ such that $ S \subset B_R(0)$ a $ wk^*$-compact set, by Alaoglu's Theorem.
$ \leftarrow$
If $ S$ is $ wk^*$-compact, so is the image of $ S$ under any $ wk^*$-continuous map. In particular, for all $ x \in X$, the map $ \hat x : S \rightarrow \mathbb{F}$, $ f \mapsto f(x)$ is compact in $ \mathbb{F}$ and hence, $ \forall x \in X$, $ \{ f(x) : f \in S \}$ is bounded. By the Principle of Uniform Boundedness (III.14.4), $ S$ is norm-bounded.
$ \qedsymbol$

Let $ \hat {}:X \rightarrow X^{**}$ be the canonical inclusion.

Proposition 1.9.4   The image of $ B_1(0)$ under $ \hat{}$ is $ \sigma(X^{**},X^*)$-dense in $ \{ \phi \in X^{**} : \Vert\phi\Vert \leq 1 \} =: B_1^{**}$

Proof. Let $ B$ be the $ \sigma(X^{**},X^*)$-closure of the unit ball of $ X$ under $ \hat{}$. Suppose $ F \in B_1^{**}\setminus B$.
Claim: There exists $ f \in X^*$, $ \alpha \in \mathbb{R}$, $ \epsilon > 0$ such that $ \forall G \in B$, Re $ G(f) \leq \alpha < \alpha + \epsilon \leq$    Re $ F(f)$.
To see this, use the Hahn-Banach theorem (compact set version) to $ X^{**}$ with the $ \sigma(X^{**},X^*)$-topology. A continuous functional on this space is an element of $ X^*$.
WLOG, $ \alpha = 1$.
Then, $ \vert F(f)\vert \geq 1 + \epsilon > 1$ but $ \Vert F\Vert \leq 1$, so $ \Vert f\Vert \leq 1$ by the claim.

    Re $\displaystyle f(x) \leq 1, \forall x \in B_1(0) \leq X,   \Vert f\Vert \leq 1. $

$ \qedsymbol$

Wednesday, February 8, 2006:

This above proposition is sometimes called Goldstine's Theorem.

Theorem 1.9.5   Let $ X$ be a Banach space. The following are equivalent:
  1. $ X$ is reflexive.
  2. $ X^*$ is reflexive.
  3. $ \sigma(X^*,X) = \sigma(X^*,X^{**})$.
  4. $ B_1(0) \subset X$ is weakly compact.
  5. Every subspace of $ X$ is reflexive.
  6. Every quotient of $ X$ is reflexive.

Proof.
  1. [ $ 1 \rightarrow 3$] Trivial
  2. [ $ 4 \rightarrow 1$] $ \sigma(X^{**},X^*)\vert _X = \sigma(X,X^*)$. By 4, $ B_1(0)$ is $ \sigma(X^{**},X^*)$-closed in the ball $ X^{**}$. By Goldstine, $ B_1(0)$ is $ \sigma(X^{**},X^*)$-dense in the ball $ X^{**}$. Thus, $ B_1(0) = $ball $ X^{**}$.
    Thus, by linearity, the canonical inclusion is onto; i.e., 1 holds.
  3. [ $ 3 \rightarrow 2$] By Alaoglu, ball $ X^*$ is $ \sigma(X^*,X)$-compact, so by 3, it is $ \sigma(X^*,X^{**})$-compact. In other words, 4 holds for $ X^*$. By $ 4 \rightarrow 1$, $ X^*$ is reflexive.
  4. [ $ 2 \rightarrow 1$] $ \overline{B_1(0)}$ is norm closed in $ X^{**}$ so $ \overline{B_1(0)}$ is $ \sigma(X^{**},X^{***})$ closed (as norm closed implies weakly closed for convex sets). However, $ X^{***} = X^*$, so $ \overline{B_1(0)}$ is $ \sigma(X^{**},X^*)$ closed in ball $ X^{**}$. By Goldstine, it is $ \sigma(X^{**},X^{*})$-dense, and so $ \overline{B_1(0)} = B_1^{**}(0)$ and so $ X$ is reflexive.
  5. [ $ 1 \rightarrow 4$] By Alaoglu (for $ X^*$), ball $ X^{**}$ is $ \sigma(X^{**},X^*)$-compact. But $ X^{**} = X$, so $ \overline{B_1(0)} =$ ball $ X^{**}$. Hence, $ \overline{B_1(0)}$ is $ \sigma(X,X^*)$-compact.
  6. [ $ 5 \rightarrow 1$] $ X \leq X$, so $ X$ is reflexive.
  7. [ $ 6 \rightarrow 1$] Also trivial.
  8. [ $ 1 \rightarrow 5$] Let $ M \leq X$. ball $ M$ = $ M \cap \overline{B_1(0)}$. $ M$ is a weakly closed subspace and $ \overline{B_1(0)}$ is wealky compact (by 1). Thus, ball $ M$ is weakly closed in $ X$. But $ \sigma(X,X^*)\vert _M = \sigma(M,M^*)$ (by Hahn-Banach).
    So, ball $ M$ is $ \sigma(M,M^*)$-compact in $ M$ and so $ M$ is reflexive.
  9. [ $ 1 \rightarrow 6$] Homework.
$ \qedsymbol$

Definition 1.9.6   A sequence $ (x_n)$ in a Banach space $ X$ is weakly Cauchy if for all $ f \in X^*$, $ (f(x_n))$ is Cauchy in $ \mathbb{F}$. We say $ X$ is weakly sequentially complete if every weakly Cauchy sequence converges.

Example: A Banach space that is not weakly sequentiall complete. Use $ C([0,1])$ with the sup-norm.
Let

$\displaystyle f_n(t) = \begin{cases}1 - nt, & t \in [0,\frac1n] \ 0 \end{cases} $

For $ \mu \in M[0,1] = C[0,1]^*$,

$\displaystyle \int f_n d\mu \rightarrow \mu(\{0\}) $

by MCT. So, $ (f_n)$ is weakly Cauchy. But $ f_n$ does not have a limit point in $ C([0,1])$. Why?
Suppose $ f_n \rightarrow f$ weakly. Then,

$\displaystyle \int f_n d\mu \rightarrow \int f d\mu. $

So if $ \mu$ is a point-mass measure at $ x$ in $ [0,1]$ then $ f_n(x) \rightarrow f(x)$. But the pointwise limit of $ f_n$ is $ \chi_{\{ 0 \}} \notin C[0,1]$.

Friday, February 10, 2006:

Remark: Why is ball $ X$ closed in $ X^{**}$? ball $ X$ is really $ \hat X \cap $ ball $ X^{**}$. Since $ \hat X$ is isometric, it is bounded below and so has closed range.

Corollary 1.9.7 (of Alaoglu)  
If $ X$ is a reflexive Banach space, then $ X$ is weakly sequentially complete.

Proof. Let $ (x_n)$ be a weakly Cauchy sequence. Let $ U$ be a neighborhood of 0. WLOG, $ U$ is basic, i.e. % latex2html id marker 14043
$ \exists f_1, \ldots, f_n \in X^*, \epsilon _1, \ldots, \epsilon _n > 0$ such that

$\displaystyle U := \{ x \in X : \vert f_i(x)\vert < \epsilon _i, i = 1, \ldots, n \} $

Notice each $ \{f_i(x_n) : n \in \mathbb{N}\}$ is bounded (it's a Cauchy sequence in $ \mathbb{F}$).
So there is $ \epsilon > 0$ such that

$\displaystyle \epsilon \{ x_n : n \in \mathbb{N}\} \subset U \} $

Thus, $ \{ x_n : n \in \mathbb{N}\}$ is weakly bounded. By PUB, % latex2html id marker 14057
$ \exists M$ such that $ \Vert x_n\Vert \leq M$. By reflexivity and Alaoglu, $ B_M(0)$ in $ X$ is weakly compact. Thus, $ (x_n)$ has a cluster point $ x \in \overline{B_m(0)}$ For each $ f \in X^*$, $ \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} f(x_n)$ exists and since $ f(x)$ is a cluster point for the $ f(x_n)$, $ \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} f(x_n) = f(x)$. That is, $ x_n \rightarrow x$ weakly. $ \qedsymbol$

Definition 1.9.8   Let $ M \leq X$, $ X$ a normed space. We say $ M$ is proximal if for all $ x \in X$, there exists $ m \in M$ such that $ \Vert x - m \Vert =$   dist$ (x,M)$.

Theorem 1.9.9   Every subspace of a reflexive Banach space is proximal.

Proof. Let $ M \leq X$, $ x \in X/M$, $ d =$   dist$ (x,M)$. Them map $ y \mapsto \Vert x-y\Vert$ is weakly lower semicontinuous (HW). As $ M \cap \overline{B_{2d}(x)}$ is weakly compact, and a lower semicontinuous function on a compact set attains its minimum, there is a $ m_0 \in M$ such that

$\displaystyle \Vert x - m_0 \Vert = \inf \{ \Vert x - m \Vert : m + M \cap \overline{B_{2d}(x)} \} $

$\displaystyle = \inf \{ \Vert x - m \Vert : m \in M \} =: dist(x,M) $

$ \qedsymbol$

Remark:
For any Banach space $ X$ and any finite dim $ M \leq X$, $ M$ is proximal.
Question - What if $ \dim(X/M)$ is finite? No (last semester's homework).

Proposition 1.9.10   For $ X$ a Banach space, $ f \in X^*$, $ \ker f$ is proximal iff % latex2html id marker 14143
$ \exists x \in X, \Vert x\Vert = 1$ such $ f(x) = \Vert f\Vert$.

Proof. Variation on Assign 5, Q5 from last semester - read text. $ \qedsymbol$


next up previous
Next: Metrizability Up: Locally Convex Spaces and Previous: Separation Properties and Constructing
Brian Bockelman 2006-04-21