|
Department of
Mathematics 203 Avery Hall University of Nebraska Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68588-0323 402-472-3731 (voice) 402-472-8466 (fax) |
.
This section is adapted from: Quantitative modeling of Derivative Securities by Marco Avellaneda, and Peter Laurence, Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, 2000, page 66,; and Options, Futures, and other Derivative Securities second edition, by John C. Hull, Prentice Hall, 1993, pages 229-230.
Historical volatility estimates require the use of
appropriate statistical estimators, usually one of the
estimators of variance. One of the main problems in this
regard is to select the sample size, or window of
observations that will be used to estimate
. Different time-windows tend to give
different volatility estimates.
Another problem with using historical volatility is that it assumes that future market performance will be reflected in past market data. Although this is a natural scientific assumption, it does not take into account historical anomalies, or changes such as the October 1987 stock market jump.
To estimate the volatility of a stock price empirically, the stock price is observed at regular intervals, such as every day, every week, or every month. Define:
is the
length of each of the time intervals (in years)
and let
for i = 1, 2, 3,... be
the increment of the logarithms of the stock prices. We are
assuming that the stock price acts as a Geometric Brownian
Motion, so that ln(Si) - ln(Si-1)
~ N(r
,
2
).
Since Si = Si-1eui, ui is the continuously compounded return, (not annualized) in the ith interval. Then the usual estimate s, of the standard deviation of the ui’s is given by
where
is the mean of the ui’s. Sometimes it is more
convenient to use the equivalent formula
As usual, we assume the stock price varies as a geometric
Brownian motion, That means that the logarithm of the stock
price is a Brownian motion with some drift and on the period
of time
, would have a variance
2
. Therefore,
s is an estimate of 
. It follows that
can be estimated as
Choosing an appropriate value for n is not easy. Because
does change over time, and data that are
too old may not be relevant for the present or the future. A
compromise that seems to work reasonably well is to use
closing prices from daily data over the most recent 90 to 180
days. Empirical research indicates that only trading days
should be used, so days when the exchange is closed should be
ignored for the purposes of the volatility calculation.
The implied volatility is the
parameter
in the Black-Scholes formula
that would give the option price that is observed in the
market, all other parameters being known.
Almost obviously, it is not possible to “invert”
the Black-Scholes formula to explicitly express
as a function of the other parameters.
Therefore, one is reduced to numerical techniques to
implicitly solve for
. A simple
idea is to use the method of bisection search to find
. Here is an illustration: Suppose the
value of a call on a non-dividend paying stock is 1.875 when S = 21, K = 20,
r = 0.1, and T - t = 0.25. We
could start by (more or less arbitrarily) guessing
= 0.20, which
gives a value of C = 1.76, which is too low. Since C is a increasing function of
, this suggests we try a value of
= 0.30. This
gives C = 2.10, too high, so we try
= 0.25, which
gives a value of C = 1.92 , and then we try a value of
= 0.225,
which yields C = and then we try
= 0.235 which
is just about right. Therefore, we take
= 0.235 or
23.5% per annum.
A faster procedure is to use the Newton method, which is iterative. Essentially we are trying to solve
, so from an initial guess
0, we from the Newton iterates
This means one has to differentiate the Black-Scholes formula
with respect to
. This
derivative is one of the “Greeks” known as vega which we will look at more
extensively in the next section. A formula for vega for a
European call option is
but still, one would probably program the iteration, with a computer rather than do it by hand.
Implied volatility is a “forward-looking” estimation technique, in contrast to the “backward-looking” historical volatility. That is, it incorporates the market’s expectations about the prices of securities and their derivatives, or more concisely, about risk. More sophisticated combinations and weighted averages combining estimates from several different derivative claims can be developed.
I check all the information on each page for correctness and typographical errors. Nevertheless, some errors may occur and I would be grateful if you would alert me to such errors. I make every reasonable effort to present current and accurate information for public use, however I do not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of information on this website. Your use of the information from this website is strictly voluntary and at your risk.
I have checked the links to external sites for usefulness. Links to external websites are provided as a convenience. I do not endorse, control, monitor, or guarantee the information contained in any external website. I don't guarantee that the links are active at all times. Use the links here with the same caution as you would all information on the Internet. This website reflects the thoughts, interests and opinions of its author. They do not explicitly represent official positions or policies of my employer.
Information on this website is subject to change without notice.
Steve Dunbar's Home Page, http://www.math.unl.edu/~sdunbar1Last modified: [an error occurred while processing this directive]